Before its premiere tomorrow night on Ten at 8:30pm, the Can of Worms set has been revealed. Here it is thanks to Can of Worms audience member @thatcarlaK... Go ahead and follow her!
And it seems to have clarified a few points of interest as to its format;
Firstly, it will not be a typical "panel show", in the way that, well, there isn't a panel as such. So, it won't look like a "7PM project" or a "Gruen Transfer".
In fact, it more resembles a talk-show set, with the clear delineation of "host" (Dicko) and guests.
But the look can also imply a lot about the show's format. The separation of host and guests could suggest that Dicko will not take as active a role in the debate at hand than first thought. Though one would think (and hope) he will still do more than throw a question at the guests and watch it bounce around.
There's also a board to the left of the picture- but I can't discern its purpose yet. Some things are better left as a surprise though.
But that's enough speculation for the moment- the set looks fairly dynamic but not too overpowering (see: The White Room), and it at least looks different to everything else we've seen on the box this year.
It has also been confirmed that there will be a Twitter-stream running during the show - one of my pet hates- you know, it's just so bloody predictable for a show these days; a show can be "modern" and "hip" without having reams of tweets broadcast on TV.
It would actually be more interesting if the show just relied on the personalities they're paying to provide the entertainment.
They need to stop cheapening the experience of watching a TV show. By seemingly breaking down the wall between TV land and viewer, it not only ruins the mystique, but also criminally gives viewers the perception that their views matter to the celebrities, when really it's just being used as a vehicle to make the show seem more engaging.
Now, in this case, I'm looking at Dancing with the Stars and Q and A, so I am holding out hope that "Worms" changes my opinion on this.
In other words, will Dicko and co. read out tweets that even slightly criticise the opinions of the guests, or take a drastically different viewpoint?
If this doesn't happen, I hope it doesn't appear again to be blantantly tokenistic.
In other news Dan Ilic, a presenter on the show has tweeted: "Met @Jason_Akermanis tonight.. great bloke... you'll love him in @canofwormstv tomorrow night on @channelten", confirming that colourful AFL personality Jason Akermanis will appear on the first edition of the show, along with Meshel Laurie.
I can't help but feel nervous about Akermanis' appearance on the show tomorrow. I know he has a (well-deserved) reputation as a shit-stirrer, but for many, he has it for all the wrong reasons.
He is often seen as an old media troll of sorts, with opinions spouting forth from his mouth (mostly about AFL football) with often very little justification, proof and whatever else you need to form a decent opinion.
Yes, he might be a nice guy, but one often gets the feeling he says things because he knows the media will pick up on it- yes, who would have thought people do that?
And though he may be "nice", he's not exactly well-liked. Let's face it, to say he's left two AFL clubs in acrimonious circumstances would be an understatement.
Yes, put on controversial people, by all means, but in the first episode of a show to put on a notorious AFL loud-mouth... It just seems slightly risky...
(And this is a show that touches on issues mostly unrelated to the AFL, remember.)
But then again, having him in a debate situation would force him to extrapolate on his usual flamethrower-opinion soundbites, and if anyone can bring the best out of "Aker" it's Denton and co.
Monday night's ep will also feature George McEncroe and Craig Reucassel, two exceptional guests, if I do say so myself.
So bring on Monday night!
0 comments:
Post a Comment